1 - What you need to know before initial submission. Editor did not intervene. [CDATA[// > You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. 6 Answers to this question. ISSN 1548-7105 (online) LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), NATURE METHODS published in 2004, UNITED STATES. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. In 1980 a granite monument was erected in Georgia, called the Guidestones. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. At the heart of our profession is an obligation to provide a useful service to the research community; we welcome feedback about how we can further improve. The work was considered important, however, not of high enough interest for a broader audience. Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. There was a fundamental flaw in the way the manuscript was handled. Author guidelines. Open Access (author-pays OA) manuscript submission at the discounted rate of US$2195 per article, as of 1 January 2022. Under Editorial Consideration - Check Status We exclude work that does not fall within this scope. What does awaiting decision mean for college application? Manuscripts should be submitted through our online submission system. We read the reviewers comments in light of our initial assessment of interest, novelty, validation, and application. In our project, the stakeholders contributed to the interpretation of qualitative data and the findings, similar to the study by Boote J et al [11]. The journal has confirmed that youve uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant to your journal. the second sentence means that you have passed this initial check and that your ms has (or will . ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. If a related manuscript is submitted elsewhere while the manuscript is under consideration at Nature Communications, a copy of the related In other words, related manuscript files means any other manuscript that overlaps with the one submitted to Nature and hence runs the risk of. " Cornell University Press fosters a culture of broad and sustained inquiry through the publication of scholarship that is influential, of lasting significance, and engaged with a diverse range of voices and experiences. The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. Peer review sometimes picks up fraud by chance, but generally it is not a reliable method for detecting fraud because it works on trust. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. Figures for recent years (original research only) are shown in the table below: Nature does not employ an editorial board of senior scientists, nor is it affiliated to a scientific society or institution, thus its decisions are independent, unbiased by scientific or national prejudices of particular individuals. [CDATA[// >Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration. [CDATA[// > Reviewer #2:Thank you for addressing the concerns. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. A paper that we submitted has recently moved from being under review to "Editorial assessment of reviews" and then quickly to "Manuscript under editorial consideration". If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout.